ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE, ANXIETY, VEGETATIVE AND COGNITIVE SPHERE IN AFTER-COVID PATIENTS
Keywords:
vegetative system, cognitive functions, COVID-19, metabolic therapy.Abstract
Introduction. The lack of clear recommendations on treating diverse neurological manifestations of COVID syndrome urges the development of methods for objectiva-tion and assessment of the severity and treatment of such clinical manifestations.
The study aimed to assess the level of vegetative, anxiety, and cognitive disorders in post-COVID patients and their development against metabolic therapy.
Material and methods. The study involved 60 participants, including 40 in the main group, and 20 controls. The main group received Mildronate® 500 mg BID for 45 days, the controls received no meta-
bolic therapy. All participants received treatment under clinical protocols according to their established diagnosis.
Results. Patients in both groups mainly complained of asthenia and fatigue. Metabolic therapy decreased the subjective complaints for asthenia and fatigue by twofold, from 88±5.2% to 45±7.8% for asthenia and 85±5.6% to 35±7.5% fot fatigue. The cog-nitive function was below the accepted threshold by the MoCA scale (≤26 points) evi-dencing the reduced function in both groups. According to the MoCA test, metabolic therapy improved the cognitive function up to the threshold level (26.8±2.7). Even the elderly group with the lowest aggregate result showed a very positive growth by 1.4 points (24.1±3.1 to 25.5±2.7).
The vegetative dystonia syndrome has nearly vanished in the main group, in-cluding the group with the most pronounced deviations (33±17.3 to 25.9±16.2). How-ever, the controls showed a slightly negative dynamics and an increase in prevalence of this syndrome (28.2±12.6 to 28.4±10.6). The vegetative reflexes in the main group demonstrated the normalisation of vegetative reactivity versus no improvement and even a more pronounced paradoxical reaction in the controls.
The quality of life has notably improved in the main group (by 2 points) vs. a decrease by 1 point in the controls. The anxiety symptoms disappeared in the main group, including the group of young patients 18 to 40 years, who demonstrated the highest anxiety (7.8±4.4 to 4.5±3.5).
Discussion. The conducted study indicated that post-COVID patients need a compex rehabilitation including symptomatic treatment and metabolic correction of energy deficiency due to toxic cell damage and endothelial dysfunction. A prevailing brain hypoxia requires a drug that can stabilize microcirculation and compensate for energy deficiency of cells under conditions of ischemia. In our study, the use of
Mildronate® reduced the asthenia and fatigue by twofold while increasing the working capacity of patients of the main group, removing the vegetative dystonia syndrome, normalizing the cognitive function, significantly reducing anxiety, and improving the quality of life.
Conclusions. Mildronate® has a high therapeutic potential and can be recommended for metabolic therapy of asthenic, vegetative, anxiety and cognitive disorders in order to improve the quality of life of patients with post-COVID syndrome.
References
1. Gane SB, Kelly C, Hopkins C. Isolated sudden onset anosmia in COVID-19 infection. A novel syndrome? Rhinology. 2020;58(3):299–301. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.114
2. Hopkins C, Surda P, Kumar N. Presentation of new onset anosmia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rhinology. 2020;58(3):295–298. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.116
3. Moein ST, Hashemian SM, Mansourafshar B, et al. Smell dysfunction: a biomarker for COVID-19. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10.1002/alr.22587. doi: 10.1002/alr.22587
4. Gupta A, Paliwal VK, Garg RK. Is COVID-19-related Guillain-Barré syndrome different? Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:177–178. doi: 10.1016/j. bbi.2020.05.051
5. Hess DC, Eldahshan W, Rutkowski E. COVID-19-related stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2020;11(3):322–325. doi: 10.1007/s12975-020-00818-9
6. Белопасов В.В., Яшу Я., Самойлова Е.М., Баклаушев В.П. Поражение нервной системы при СOVID-19 [Вelopasov VV, Yashu Ya, Samoilova EM, Baklaushev VP. Damage to the nervous system in COVID-19. Clinical practice. 2020;11(2):60–80. doi: 10.17816/clinpract34851. (In Russ.)
7. Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J, et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-0074-x
8. Gandhi S, Srivastava AK, Ray U, Tripathi PP. Is the Collapse of the Respiratory Center in the Brain Responsible for Respiratory Breakdown in COVID-19 Patients? ACS Chem Neuro- Sci. 2020;11(10):1379-1381. doi: 10.1021/ acschemneuro.0c00217
9. Zhou Z, Kang H, Li S, Zhao X. Understanding the neurotropic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2: from neurological manifestations of COVID-19 to potential neurotropic mechanisms. J Neurol. 2020;1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09929-7
10. Le Сoupanec A, Desforges M, Meessen-Рinard M, et al. Cleavage of a neuroinvasive human respiratory virus spike glycoprotein by proprotein convertases modulates neurovirulence and virus spread within the central nervous system. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(11):e1005261. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005261
11. Jacob S, Muppidi S, Guidon A, et al. International MG/COVID-19 Working Group. Guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Neurol Sci. 2020;412:116803. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116803
12. Lippi A, Domingues R, Setz C, et al. SARS-CoV-2: at the crossroad between aging and neurodegeneration. Mov Disord. 2020;35(5):716–720. doi: 10.1002/mds.28084
13. Papa SM, Brundin P, Fung VS, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. Mov Disord. 2020;35(5):711–715. doi: 10.1002/mds.28067
14. Boyko AN, Lashch NYu, Spirin NN, et al. Vedeniye patsiyentov s rasseyannym sklerozom v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19. Vremennyye metodicheskiye rekomendatsii. Version 1.19.04. Moscow; 2020. 12 p. (In Russ)
15. Rajabally YA, Goedee HS, Attarian S, Hartung H-P. Management Challenges for Chronic Dysimmune Neuropathies During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Muscle Nerve. 2020;10.1002/ mus. 26896. doi:10.1002/mus.26896
16. Favas TT, Dev P, Chaurasia RN, et al. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of proportions. Neurol Sci. 2020 Dec;41(12):3437-70
17. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1:S2215-0366(21)00084-5. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33836148; PMCID: PMC8023694
18. Noor-Ul-Huda Maria, Ain Siddiq et al. The Effects of COVID-19 on Hypothalamus: Is it Another Face of SARS-CoV-2 That May Potentially Control the Level of COVID-19 Severity? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24482.25289
19. Available from: https://www.dysautonomiainternational.org/blog/wordpress/a-tale-of-two-syndromes-pots-and-mcas
20.Yiping Lu, Xuanxuan Li, Daoying Geng, et al. Cerebral Micro-Structural Changes in COVID-19 Patients – An MRI-based 3-month Follow-up Study. The Lancet. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100484
21. Willi S, Lüthold R, Hunt A, Hänggi NV, Sejdiu D, Scaff C, Bender N, Staub K, Schlagenhauf P. COVID-19 sequelae in adults aged less than 50 years: A systematic review. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021 Mar-Apr;40:101995. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2021.101995. Epub 2021 Feb 22. PMID: 33631340; PMCID: PMC7898978
22. Zhou H, Lu S, Chen J, Wei N, Wang D, Lyu H, et al. The Landscape of Cognitive Function in Recovered COVID-19 Patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2020;129:98–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.06.022. J Neurol. 2020;27(9):1764–1773. doi: 10.1111/ene.14277
23. Baig AM, Khaleeq A, Ali U, Syeda H. Evidence of the COVID-19 Virus Targeting the CNS: Tissue Distribution, Host-Virus Interaction, and Proposed Neurotropic Mechanisms. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020;11(7):995–998. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00122
24. Natoli S, Oliveira V, Calabresi P, Maia LF, Pisani A. Does SARSCov-2 Invade the Brain? Translational Lessons from Animal Models. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(9):1764–1773. doi: 10.1111/ene.14277
25. Екушева Е.В., Войтенков В.Б. Особенности ведения полиморбидных пациентов с хронической ишемией мозга в условиях пандемии COVID-19 [Ekusheva EV, Voitenkov VB. Features of the management of polymorbid patients with chronic cerebral ischemia in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Neuronews. 2020:10(72):2-3 (In Russ.)
26. Alemanno F, Houdayer E, Parma A, Spina A, Del Forno A, Scatolini A, et al. COVID-19 Cognitive Deficits after Respiratory Assistance in the Subacute Phase: A COVID-Rehabilitation Unit Experience. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246590
27. Jaywant A, Vanderlind WM, Alexopoulos GS, Fridman CB, Perlis RH, Gunning FM. Frequency and Profile of Objective Cognitive Deficits in Hospitalized Patients Recovering from COVID-19. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021:1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-00978-8
28. Whiteside DM, Oleynick V, Holker E, et al. Neurocognitive deficits in severe COVID-19 infection: Case series and proposed model. Clin Neuropsychol. 2021;1-20. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2021.1874056
29. Stracciari A, Bottini G, Guarino M,; Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Study Group of the Italian Neurological Society. Cognitive and behavioral manifestations in SARS-CoV-2 infection: not specific or distinctive features? Neurol Sci. 2021;1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05231-0
